IMPROVEMENTS IN SYMBOL SIGN DESIGN
TO AID OLDER DRIVERS
The proportion of American adults age 65 and older is expected to comprise
20 percent of the population by the year 2020. Studies have shown that older drivers
have higher rates of accidents, injuries, and fatalities on a per-mile-driven basis.
A major cause of roadway accidents for older drivers is failure to heed traffic signs.Previous
research found that older drivers have difficulty detecting, reading, understanding,
and responding to some symbolic traffic signs. This study had four objectives:
- Determine the effectiveness of symbol signs in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices (MUTCD).
- Develop and test alternative symbol signs to enhance their effectiveness. Alternatives
included redesign or modification of MUTCD signs, or the creation of novel signs (figure
1).
- Determine which specific elements of symbol signs are critical to effective sign design.
- Develop symbol sign design guidelines for current and future signs that are responsive
to the sensory and cognitive capabilities of all drivers, including older drivers.
Research Methods
The study was conducted in two phases of laboratory investigations. The first phase
assessed daytime visibility and comprehension of all 85 of the symbols in the MUTCD.
Based on these results, a sample of 18 symbols (6 "best," 6 "intermediate,"
and 6 "worst") were selected for further testing of glance legibility, reaction
time, and conspicuity.
The second phase investigated comprehension plus daytime and nighttime legibility
distance measures for 14 modified and 5 novel symbol signs. The purpose of this phase
was to improve visibility, especially for older drivers.
Each sign was digitized
and its spatial frequency was determined prior to its exposure to a series of computerized
filters that model older drivers' loss in contrast sensitivity. Males and females
in three age groups: young (18-39 years old), middle-age (40-59 years old), and older
(60 years and older) were tested.Results
Phase I results found: (1) older drivers' comprehension of symbol signs was poorer
than both younger and middle-aged drivers; and (2) older drivers' legibility distances
were shorter. These findings were especially true of recreational (?) and cultural
signs, where the symbols are ambiguous and background color tends to provide poor
conspicuity. Phase II results from the modified and novel sign studies found that
sign modification did little to improve comprehension, which was from 67 to 100 percent
across all signs. Table 1 shows Phase II legibility distance results. Overall, the
degree of improvement for the redesigned signs was greater than for the modified signs,
and the redesign was especially helpful for the least legible signs.
Study Implications
Based on the experimental results and the redesign techniques employed in the study,
a number of guidelines have been suggested. These include:- Minimize symbol complexity by using very few details.
- Maximize the distance between symbol sign elements.
- Use representational rather than abstract symbols.
- Use solid rather than outline figures for designs.
- Standardize the design of arrowheads, human figures, and vehicles. Retain maximum
contrast between the symbol and the sign background.
For More Information
A full report on symbol sign design is available from the FHWA R&D Report Center,
phone no. 703 285-2144.
Title: Symbol Signing for Older Drivers
Publication
No. FHWA-RD-94-069
This research was conducted by Swanson Transportation Consultants,
Inc.
For more information, contact:
Dr. Truman M. Mast
Human Factors
Team Leader, HSR-30
703 285-2404.Back to Human Factors