July/August 2002
Recent
Publications
Compiled
by Zac Ellis of FHWA's Office of Research and Technology Services
Below
are brief descriptions of reports recently published by the Federal
Highway Administration's (FHWA) Office of Research, Development, and
Technology. All of the publications are available from the National
Technical Information Service (NTIS). In some cases, limited copies
of the publication are available from the Research and Technology
(R&T) Report Center.
When ordering from NTIS, include the NTIS PB number (or publication
number) and the publication title. You may also visit the NTIS Web
site at www.ntis.gov to order publications online. Call NTIS for current
prices. For customers outside the United States, Canada, and Mexico,
the cost is usually double the listed price. Address requests to:
National
Technical Information Service
5285 Port Royal Road
Springfield, VA 22161
Telephone: (703) 605-6000
Toll-free number: (800) 553-NTIS (6847)
Expanded Sales Desk Hours: 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. EST, Mon.-Fri.
Requests for items available from the R&T Report Center
should be addressed to:
R&T Report Center, HRTS-03
Federal Highway Administration
9701 Philadelphia Court, Unit Q
Lanham, MD 20706
Telephone: (301) 577-0906
Fax: (301) 577-1421
For more information on research and technology publications
coming from FHWA, visit the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center's
(TFHRC) Web site at www.tfhrc.gov,
FHWA's Web site at www.fhwa.dot.gov,
the National Transportation Library's Web site at http://ntl.bts.gov,
or the OneDOT information network at http://isweb.tasc.dot.gov/library/library.htm.
Pedestrian
Facilities Users Guide — Providing
Safety And Mobility
Publication No. FHWA-RD-01-102
The
purpose of the Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide is to provide useful
information on how to identify the safety and mobility needs of pedestrians
within roadway rights-of-way. This guide is intended primarily for
engineers, planners, safety professionals, and decision-makers, but
citizens also may find the guide useful in identifying ways to improve
the safety and mobility of pedestrians.
The guide
provides an overview of the creation of a pedestrian-friendly environment,
describing basic pedestrian crash trends and examining and classifyingcrash
types to determine appropriate countermeasures. It also features definitions
of 13 pedestrian crash-type groupings and factors important in selecting
the best countermeasures. These crash groupings then are presented
in terms of how to select pedestrian safety improvements to address
specific crash problems. Engineers will find useful details regarding
47 different engineering improvements for pedestrians. These improvements
relate to the walking environment, roadway design, intersection treatments,
traffic calming, traffic management, and signals and signs. At the
end of the guide, users will find a simplified list of improvements
to address certain broad objectives (e.g., reducing speeds on a street
and reducing pedestrian exposure) without the need for pedestrian
crash data.
The NTIS
order number is PB2002-103024.
 |
The
Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide will help engineers and
planners design crosswalks that enable pedestrians, like this
visually impaired man and his seeing-eye dog in Washington,
DC, safely cross U.S. roadways. |
An
Analysis of Factors Contributing to "Walking Along Roadway"
Crashes: Research Study and Guidelines for Sidewalks and Walkways
Publication No. FHWA-RD-01-101
A
variety of factors are widely acknowledged to have an impact on the
risk of pedestrian-motor vehicle crashes. The factors that have been
most extensively researched are the geometric characteristics of the
road, including the presence of sidewalks. Epidemiologists, however,
have considered demographics and neighborhood characteristics, but
have not researched these factors sufficiently. This study uses a
case-control methodology and applies conditional and binary logistic
models to determine the effects of cross-sectional roadway design
attributes and socio-economics and census data on the likelihood that
a site will become a crash site.
A total
of 47 crash sites and 94 comparison sites are analyzed. Physical design
factors found to contribute to a higher likelihood of pedestrian crashes
include higher traffic volumes, higher speed limits, the lack of wide
grassy shoulder areas, and the absence of sidewalks. Nongeometrical
factors associated with a significantly higher likelihood of crashes
include high levels of unemployment, older housing stock, lower proportions
of families within households, and more single-parent households.
This information suggests that some neighborhoods, due to increased
exposure or specific types of
exposure, may be especially appropriate sites for pedestrian safety
measures such as sidewalks, lower speed roadway designs, and the addition
of wide, grassy
shoulders.
 |
A
new study of pedestrian-vehicle crashes looks at the impact
of demographics and neighborhood characteristics on the likelihood
that a given location will become a crash site. Wide sidewalks
and bicycle lanes like these improve safety for pedestrians
and cyclists. |
The report
also documents the results of a behavioral evaluation of a new sidewalk
in SeaTac, WA (appendix A). Recommended guidelines and priorities
for sidewalks and walkways are given in appendix B.
Seismic
Vulnerability of New Highway Construction, Executive Summary
Publication
No. FHWA-RD-99-098
This
executive summary provides an overview of the results from a Federal
Highway Administration (FHWA) Seismic Research Program that performed
a series of special
studies addressing the seismic vulnerability of new highway structures.
The studies developed technical information that could form the basis
of future specifications for the seismic design of bridges. This project
divided the work into 5 areas and 13 tasks, focusing on the following
elements: review of current seismic design criteria; the seismic hazard
exposure of the American highway system; foundation design and soil
behavior; structural design; structural analysis and response; the
relative importance of specific bridges; and an assessment of the
impact of current and recently completed research.
The Seismic
Research Program aimed in part to address the differences in seismicity,
bridge types, and typical design details between the central and eastern
United States and those previously studied in California and the western
United States. In many cases, west coast design practices required
considerable modification before implementation in the central and
eastern United States.
The project
resulted in 34 research reports, of which 31 are summarized in this
document. Seventeen of the reports have been published as National
Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER) or Multidisciplinary
Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER) reports. The research
agencies' final reports for the other tasks are available from MCEER
upon request.
An independent
assessment of the results and potential impact of the project also
was performed. This impact assessment report, to be published by FHWA
(or MCEER), has identified critical topics that should be addressed
in seismic bridge design specifications and contains a "straw
man" for a set of bridge design guidelines. This impact assessment
is contained in Report No. MCEER 99-0009.
Other
Articles in this issue:
Taking Concrete to the Next Level
Getting It Together
Fine-Tuning Innovative Technologies
On the Road Testing Roads
Paving the Way
Making Roads Better and Better
Texas Tests Precast for Speed and Usability
The Biggest Bang for Your Buck
New
Software Promises to Put Whitetopping on the Map
Road
Map to the Future