Humans have been building roads since the Romans, so some may
assume that the highway community knows everything there is to
know about pavement. Not so. Pavements are highly variable in
smoothness and durability, depending on the origin of the materials
used to construct them, weather conditions such as temperature
and humidity during and after construction, and how well (or not
so well) the materials were compacted. Construction of pavements
that are safe, smooth, and durable requires good design, sound
selection of materials and mix design, and well-controlled construction
processes.
 |
| This onsite mobile concrete
plant produced a quality concrete mixture for an Indiana project
governed by performance-related specifications. |
The Federal Highway Administration's (FHWA) Concrete Pavement Technology
Program (CPTP) is helping designers, material suppliers, contractors,
and State agencies improve portland cement concrete (PCC) pavements
by addressing some of the critical gaps in knowledge. The CPTP authorized
under the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) is funding research on approximately 30 projects
for 6 years to improve the performance and cost-effectiveness of
concrete pavements. During the first years, FHWA and the Innovative
Pavement Research Foundation conducted the CPTP jointly. In the
summer of 2002, FHWA assumed sole responsibility.
The CPTP will produce practical and readily usable tools, guidelines,
methods, and software to be used in the selection of materials,
mix and pavement design, construction, and operation. The goals
are to reduce user delays and costs, improve performance, and foster
innovation. The July/August 2002 issue of PUBLIC ROADS discussed
selected CPTP projects in depth, and this followup article describes
the program's progress and highlights over the past year, starting
with selected CPTP projects in advanced pavement design systems.
The Concrete Pavement Technology Program was developed and is being
implemented by FHWA in cooperation with the State departments of
transportation (DOTs), American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO), industry, and academia. "This
program is an excellent example of a public-private partnership,"
says Tommy L. Beatty, FHWA's director of pavement technology."The
CPTP has produced numerous technologies that will make a significant
impact on the transportation program."
Advanced Pavement Design Systems
These projects are pioneering changes in structural design, materials,
and cost analysis. The industry can expect guidance, tools, and test
methods to support the design and evaluation of highly cost-effective
and durable concrete mixtures and analytical tools to perform sound
economic evaluation of alternative pavement designs.
Joint Sealing
Currently, nearly all State highway agencies require transverse
joint sealing, which adds about 2 to 7 percent to the initial construction
costs of pavements and even more in resealing activities. If narrow,
unsealed joints on short-jointed concrete pavements can perform
as well as sealed joints, States may save millions of dollars in
construction and maintenance costs. By eliminating or reducing the
need for joint maintenance, this change also will improve safety
by reducing the need for lane closures that are inherently dangerous
to both drivers and maintenance crews.
A 3-year CPTP study on the cost effectiveness of sealing transverse
contraction joints is one of several projects that will help agencies
determine when, where, and how to seal pavement joints. In this
study the lead on the program, Dr. Katie Hall, and her colleagues
will take a close look at the performance of 35 to 40 experiments
in 12 States on sealed and unsealed joints. CPTP-funded demonstrations
in Illinois, Kansas, and Ohio on high-performance concrete pavements,
for example, are comparing sealed versus unsealed joints.
In the 1950s Wisconsin DOT (WisDOT) engineers questioned the cost
effectiveness of sealing joints in PCC pavements. Since that time
Wisconsin has built numerous test sections and documented findings
to determine the effects of unsealed joints on pavement performance.
In 1990 WisDOT adopted a department policy of not sealing PCC joints
in new construction and maintenance. "We are convinced that leaving
joints unsealed is the most cost-effective way to deal with joints
in PCC pavements," says Steve Krebs, WisDOT pavement engineer.
A 1997 report, Stephen F. Shober's The Great Unsealing: A Perspective
on PCC Joint Sealing, documented Wisconsin's findings and started
a national controversy. "Although Shober took a lot of heat for
his stand, this research intrigued us in Illinois because we have
the same weather conditions," says Matt Mueller, Illinois Department
of Transportation (IDOT) pavement engineer.
At that time IDOT was conducting a study of how much water was
passing through its concrete and full-depth bituminous pavements.
A flow meter on the under drains revealed the presence of significant
water passing through the typical sealed joint pavements. Recognizing
that seals fail to keep the water out, IDOT decided to do its own
joint sealing studies and asked crews on then-current projects to
install a few 61-meter (200-foot) sections with narrow unsealed
transverse joints. In 1997 the first test section on IL 64 near
St. Charles compared three variations: joints with no seals, preformed
elastomeric (rubbery) joint seals, and a reservoir sealed with rubberized
hot sealant. Three subsequent test sections of unsealed and sealed
joints followed in 1997 on IL 59 at Naperville, in 1999 on US 67
at Jacksonville, and in 2000 on IL 2 at Dixon.
 |
| One of the CPTP studies will
assess the effect of joint sealing or lack of sealing on the
performance of concrete pavement. |
According to David Lippert, engineer of physical research with
IDOT, the test sections have done so well that IDOT has adopted
a no-seal standard effective for all jointed-concrete projects let
after January 1, 2003. Estimated savings top $1 million per year.
The specified saw cut is so narrow at 5 millimeters (0.19 inch)
that only sand-size material can enter—not large enough to
spall the surface of the concrete.
"We learned right away that many standard saw blades are wider
than we would like," says Lippert, "so we notified our construction
personnel to make sure the narrow blades are used."
In the past, the roughness from overfilled poured joints and the
tire slap noise from preformed joint sealant were major concerns,
according to Lippert. "It would ride rough until the snowplows or
the traffic wore down the seal, but with the no-seal joints the
ride is smooth and definitely quieter."
Dr. Hall thinks that the national study may show different options
are more cost effective in different regions depending on the climate,
the subgrade soil, the aggregates used in the concrete, and the
joint spacing.
Concrete Materials and Mix Integration
Five projects under Marcia Simon, PCC pavement laboratory manager
at FHWA, are examining the integration of materials to improve PCC
pavement mixes. Incompatibilities of materials within mixes can
result in early stiffening, excessive retardation, early-age cracking,
and detrimental effects on the air void system.
Researchers are examining deficiencies in existing testing methods
for assessing concrete material suitability, production and placement
methods, finishing, and influences of temperature and humidity.
For example, since the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) C-359 test for early stiffening of portland cement may not
apply to cementitious materials with chemical admixtures, research
will evaluate the mini-slump cone test for identifying material
combinations that produce early stiffening. The researchers will
write guidelines for evaluating material combinations for concrete
pavements and recommend methods of communicating the information
to the concrete pavement industry.
Vibrating Slope Apparatus
The second generation of the vibrating slope apparatus developed
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is a promising tool for assessing
the workability of paving concrete. The University of Texas, Iowa
State University, and the Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center
are evaluating a vibrating slope apparatus with updated electronics
and software. The apparatus quantifies workability by measuring
the time for a measured mass of concrete to move out of the chute
under certain vibration energy. The study is assessing concrete
slump, chute angle, vibration force, and test procedures. When evaluations
are complete, the vibrating slope apparatus will debut on the road
as a component of FHWA's Mobile Concrete Laboratory.
 |
| This vibrating slope apparatus
tests the workability of a concrete sample by measuring its
resistance to movement under vibration. |
Concrete Mixture Optimization
With such a wealth of material from multiple sources, pavement
and materials engineers need a practical tool to select the optimal
mix for a given paving project. Facing so many choices in chemical
admixtures, fly ash, cements, mineral additives, water/cement ratios,
and aggregates, how do work crews avoid incompatibilities in concrete
mixes?
"Contractors may rely on hunches or past experience, so we're developing
a tool to give them rational choices," says Dr. Robert Rasmussen,
P.E., of The Transtec Group, Inc., an FHWA consultant.
Rasmussen is gathering literature for an expert database and inviting
field input from a technical advisory panel of State DOT concrete
engineers, contractors, and trade association representatives. The
goal is to produce by 2005 a user-friendly computer program to optimize
the mixes. With the software, the user will be able to identify
the starting-point for site-specific conditions quickly and optimize
the mix based on chosen targets such as cost, strength, workability,
durability, long-term performance potential, and numerous other
properties.
 |
| Concrete workability is important
for proper placement, consolidation, and finishing of concrete
pavements, as shown in this highway project in Colorado. |
"We're excited about this project as it will reduce our risk of
producing incompatible mixes," says advisory panel member Pete Capon
of Rieth-Riley Construction, an Indiana paving contractor. "Now
we go through the time-consuming and necessary task of gathering
materials, doing trials, and then determining what we can and cannot
do in material combination. This tool has been needed for a long
time and is a big leap forward."
The optimization software will enable a user to plug in a new ingredient
such as a change in fly ash, imported materials, or a different
cement source, and predict the potential for problems. According
to Capon, users of this tool could move from State to State and
do theoretical mix designs with ease and produce reliable numbers
for estimating and construction. During the contract bidding process,
DOTs might use the tool to predict problems and specify those combinations
that cannot be used for construction.
Mobile Concrete Laboratory
An integral part of the research and development part of the program,
this traveling project is primarily a tool to obtain real-world
test data for use in developing and refining CPTP research products.
Additionally, the Mobile Concrete Laboratory also acts as a deployment
and technology transfer instrument by introducing Federal, State,
and local transportation personnel to state-of-the-art technologies
in materials selection and mixture design. In this role, the lab
focuses on shortening the acceptance time for new technologies through
onsite demonstrations. Therefore, the Mobile Concrete Laboratory
is both a research and development and a technology transfer tool.
 |
| This technician with FHWA's
Mobile Concrete Laboratory is putting liquid in an air void
analyzer prior to measuring the air void systems in a fresh
concrete sample. |
"One of the major technologies we're presenting now is the air
void analyzer," says Gary Crawford, FHWA project manager for the
lab. (Last year AASHTO's technology group selected the air void
analyzer as a new technology with a big payoff.) Although previous
tests could identify the air quantity in fresh concrete, they did
not measure the size of the bubbles or the spacing between them—characteristics
that predict freeze-thaw resistance. The air void analyzer enables
a user to determine that a problem exists and enables the user to
adjust the admixtures to improve the concrete before placing the
pavement instead of afterward, when it is too late.
"The implementation panel for the air void analyzer is developing
an AASHTO provisional specification so the States will start using
this equipment," Crawford says. See www.aashtotig.org
for more information.
The Mobile Concrete Laboratory also is assisting States with technologies
such as maturity meters—heat sensors embedded in fresh concrete
to measure heat gain, which can be used to estimate strength. According
to Crawford, instead of relying on traditional methods of casting
cylinders or beams and breaking them at 6 or 7 days to confirm strength,
a State or local agency using the temperature probe may learn that
sufficient strength has developed to open up that pavement in 2
or 3 days, saving 4 days of construction time and inconvenience
to the traveling public.
To encourage DOTs to try out the analyzer, maturity meters, and
other testing equipment to determine if they want to invest, the
laboratory will loan the equipment, ship it to a site, and send
a technician to work with the onsite staff. If the State wants to
educate its employees on a number of tests, it can ask the lab to
schedule a site visit. Typically the Mobile Concrete Lab visits
four to five field projects per year, staying at each from 2 to
4 weeks. From November through March, the lab sets up in parking
lots to showcase its technologies to attendees at the American Concrete
Pavement Association's meetings and State conventions.
The laboratory staff documents the results from every site visit
in a report describing how new technologies were utilized. These
reports, combined with technical presentations, papers, and magazine
articles, are key to the success of the Mobile Concrete Laboratory
and have been an effective way to share this information with the
transportation community.
During fiscal year 2003, the lab scheduled eight equipment loans
to highway agencies to evaluate nondestructive impact-echo tests
for measuring thickness of existing concrete pavements in lieu of
destructive core tests. The laboratory set up displays and made
technical presentations at conferences in Colorado, Illinois, New
Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Texas. During
the remainder of the fiscal year, the lab will travel to Florida
and back to New York and Pennsylvania. Other States—California,
Indiana, Iowa, New York, and North Carolina—have requested
lab participation on field projects.
Advanced Quality Systems
CPTP projects will promote improvements in the as-constructed quality
of concrete pavements through advances in the availability and application
of technology, analytical tools, and guidance for quality control.
Contributions to date include the HIPERPAV II software, workshop materials
addressing nondestructive and innovative testing, a prototype software
tool to guide the selection of materials and procedures for curing,
and increased knowledge and experience with performance-related specifications.
HIPERPAV II
This user-friendly software application released in the late 1990s
runs on the Microsoft® Windows® operating system and can
be used as a tool to help highway agencies avoid premature failure
of concrete pavements. The software user can input site- and time-specific
weather data and information on the specific concrete mix to be
used on the project. The software models the changes that take place
as the concrete sets and cures, enabling the engineer to assess
the likelihood of early-age cracking in real time so that adjustments
to the mix design, paving schedule, and curing practices can be
made if needed. For example, if work crews anticipate thunderstorms
in the late afternoon followed by a cold front, with HIPERPAV they
can determine the effect on the concrete and make a decision to
cover with tarps or insulated blankets. On a hot summer day, they
may change the timing of placement to paving at night.
Powerful new modules for HIPERPAV II will predict the early-age
performance of jointed plain concrete pavement (JPCP) and its performance
beyond the first 72 hours and also the early-age performance of
continuously reinforced concrete pavements (CRCP). The new release
will include an implementation package for training field personnel.
Although HIPERPAV II is not a structural design tool, it may be
used in the design phase to help the designer identify potential
materials-related problems and make appropriate adjustments to the
mix or structural design to prevent cracking. In a forensic mode,
HIPERPAV may diagnose a cracking problem so that the same mistakes
are not repeated on a future project.
The developers of the software conducted workshops with a beta
version of HIPERPAV II in Iowa, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, and
then modified the tool based on the feedback. The initial release
of HIPERPAV II was in the summer of 2003. After further refinement
based on feedback from additional workshops, the final software
version will be delivered by January 2004.
Field Trials
In the highway industry, implementation of new technology encounters
a "Catch-22" situation. A work crew cannot use new technology unless
it is specified, but a State cannot specify or allow a new technology
until it is tried and proven. FHWA study manager Sam Tyson, in partnership
with multiple academic and engineering firms, is solving the dilemma
with pilot tests of new technologies. In a field trial, an FHWA
work crew tests a technology under development by taking it to a
local work crew or State staff and working with them on a trial
project. Then FHWA uses the feedback to improve the product.
 |
| Elliptical dowel bar baskets
place on grade. |
 |
| Wheel path elliptical dowel
bar placement. |
 |
Elliptical dowel bar in
a basket assembly
Courtesy of Jim Grove, Center for Portland Cement Concrete
Pavement Technology, Iowa State University. |
Field Trial: Magnetic Tomography
Dowels may be a small item in concrete pavements, but their placement
is critical for spanning the joint and providing proper load transfer.
Misaligned dowels can lock up the joint and cause premature failure,
but identifying how accurately they are placed is difficult. A new
technology, magnetic tomography, developed by a German manufacturer
for locating unexploded ordnance, promises to become an important
monitoring tool during construction.
"We're excited about magnetic tomography because it can show us
the precise location of the full length of the dowel in three dimensions
within a tolerance range of perhaps 1 millimeter (0.039 inch),"
Tyson notes.
 |
| Placement of a partial-width
base panel over the friction-reducing polyethylene sheeting.
|
At a presentation for the Transportation Research Board in January
2003, the German manufacturer—MIT Sicherheit Besser of Dresden—demonstrated
that using this imaging device to locate a dowel bar in concrete
shows the dowel as clearly as magnetic tomography shows a bar surrounded
by air since concrete has no magnetic qualities.
Although FHWA has not yet tested magnetic tomography in this country
in a field trial, the device is a proven technology in Europe where
the manufacturer has implemented it in dowel bar locations for numerous
projects. By using this imaging device during construction, a work
crew can pick up problem placement caused by equipment malfunction
and correct the problem early on instead of miles down the road.
Field Trial: Monitoring Maturity Using the TEMP System
Another field trial will take the maturity test to a new level
by adding software and miniature sensors to monitor pavement temperature
during curing. A member of the work crew will set the button-sized
devices into the concrete during placement and then monitor the
curing temperature using computer printouts in graphic formats.
An FHWA contractor is developing the "Total Environmental Management
for Paving" (TEMP) software and is planning field tests with two
State DOTs. The software program can be set up to answer a question
such as: "I want to open this pavement to traffic 48 hours from
construction at 2 p.m. on Tuesday. Can I do that?" Using measurements
from the temperature sensors, the software will be able to give
the user an exact time—earlier, the same, or later—when
the new pavement can be opened to traffic.
"We hope this system will be adaptable to remote sensing," Tyson
adds, "maybe picking up these data points through long-range wireless
technology, thus allowing monitoring from a centralized workstation."
Dowel Bars
Several studies are looking at alternative dowel bar materials.
In March 2002, FHWA published preliminary findings from field trials
in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Ohio, and Wisconsin in a report
titled High Performance Concrete Pavements. A recently initiated
study with Iowa State University will examine elliptical steel and
elliptical fiber-reinforced plastic (FRP) dowels.
Enhanced User Satisfaction
Minimizing traffic disruptions due to pavement construction, reconstruction,
rehabilitation, and maintenance meets the Long Life Pavement Program
goal of enhanced user satisfaction. Projects include using precast
concrete panels to expedite highway pavement construction and for
full-depth repair, weekend intersection reconstruction, optimal traffic
management when reconstructing urban highways, and tools and techniques
to achieve smooth pavements.
Placing Precast Concrete Panels in Highways
Last year's PUBLIC ROADS article, "Texas Tests Precast for Speed
and Usability," examined a pilot project by the Center for Transportation
Research (University of Texas, Austin) on a Georgetown, TX, frontage
road. The work crew installed 700 meters (2,300 feet) of precast
pavement on both sides of a new bridge. To aid with alignment when
assembled, the precaster fabricated the panels with continuous shear
keys in the edges. The panels were pretensioned crosswise during
fabrication and post-tensioned lengthwise during construction.
California is proposing a project similar to the Georgetown pilot
for I-10 in the Los Angeles area, and Missouri also is considering
a field trial using the precast method pioneered on the Georgetown
project, according to Mark Swanlund, FHWA study manger.
Michigan State University will take the next research step, a field
trial using precast for full-depth repairs, when its researchers
direct pilot projects in Michigan and Colorado. Instead of pretensioning
and post-tensioning, the precast panels will incorporate steel reinforcement
and load transfer. Dowel bars will be cast into the slab at the
casting yard so that the dowels can be positioned perfectly horizontally
and aligned to prevent the joints from locking. On the job site,
the dowels will fit into slots cut into the adjacent pavement, then
be sealed with grout.
"I find this field trial exciting, as I worked with full-depth
temporary repairs using precast panels with the Virginia Transportation
Research Council in the 1970s," says FHWA's Sam Tyson. "Those repairs
had no load transfer, so the 18-wheelers would cause movement, and
we would take the panels out in a year or so and use them in a different
location. With the advances in technology, the Michigan State project
will be a permanent repair."
Swanlund adds, "Installing precast panels in both the construction
and maintenance modes eliminates the time-consuming curing step
from the field construction phase of the project while maintaining
high-quality concrete." Precast panels can be cast in a controlled
environment at the casting yard, stockpiled, and then taken to the
job site when needed. With this technology, work crews will be able
to install durable repairs in record time on interstates and highways
in busy urban areas, reducing delays and traffic costs.
Traffic Management Optimization For Reconstructing
Urban Freeways
Often the temporary disruption caused by pavement reconstruction
results in costs to the highway user and the local community that
dwarf the capital costs of renewal. Concrete pavement contractors
are suggesting innovative construction and traffic management methods
to reconstruct heavily traveled sections of urban freeways using
long-life pavement. Unfortunately, many engineers doubt long-life
pavement reconstruction can be accomplished with minimal disruptions
for motorists. Success in providing a quality long-life pavement
with minimal disruptions may decrease user costs and improve safety
significantly by reducing workers' exposure to traffic during construction.
The University of California-Berkley demonstrated the feasibility
of rehabilitating 2.8-lane kilometers (1.7-lane miles) within a
construction window of a 55-hour weekend and documented the productivity
benefits. In a followup project, the Texas Transportation Institute
will undertake and document a demonstration project, survey motorists
and residents, develop a matrix model on methods to involve the
public, and provide methods of technology transfer—including
a national open house—to communicate the model to the highway
construction industry. Technology transfer products may include
reports, summary papers, brochures, posters, audio/visual presentations,
slideshows, videos, CD-ROMs, DVD-ROMs, or a Web site, and possibly
all of these and other tools. Completion is expected by March 2005.
Smoothness Criteria for Concrete Pavements
This project will identify the characteristics of objectionable
longitudinal profiles, ways to measure those factors, the causes,
and ways to avoid creating them. The study will establish appropriate
limits for smoothness specifications and determine methods to identify
and correct localized roughness in concrete pavement.
Research has shown that concrete pavements that are built smooth
initially will stay smooth longer than pavements that are built
rough initially. To provide smoother pavements many States employ
incentive and disincentive provisions in their construction contracts.
These provisions provide a financial incentive to contractors who
exceed the require pavement smoothness while penalizing those who
build a pavement rougher than specified. Forty-five of 52 State
DOTs utilize smoothness specifications for construction acceptance
of concrete pavement.
Most DOTs currently use a profilograph or other response-type roughness
meter to measure the smoothness. However, there is a growing trend
to change the measurement device to inertial profiler and to more
advanced roughness indices, the International Roughness Index (IRI).
AASHTO currently is considering adoption of a provisional standard
for pavement smoothness based on inertial profilers and the IRI.
These are some of the questions that researchers will investigate: