Editor's Notes
Along the Road
Internet Watch
Calendar
NHI Update
Order Online
Contact Info
Past Issues
Public Roads
Home
|

"Steps for Action" Making Sure ITS Is Ready for the
Year 2000
by Pamela Crenshaw
At the annual meeting of the
Intelligent Transportation Society of America on May 5, 1998, Deputy Secretary
of Transportation Mortimer L. Downey sounded a call to action, announcing
a national summit of the intelligent transportation systems (ITS) community
to address Year 2000 (Y2K) computer problems in ITS.
"The problem has its origins in computer systems that store only
the last two numbers of years in dates (such as 98 for 1998; the 19 is
assumed). This requires less disk storage space, but poses a major problem
as we head into the year 2000. Computer systems could interpret 00 as
1900, rather than 2000. This could cause computers to crash, generate
bad data, or otherwise malfunction. Transportation systems that depend
on computers or vehicles using embedded computer chips could shut down,"
Downey said.
The national summit was hosted
by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) in partnership with 22
transportation associations and professional groups on July 27. This one-day
summit entitled "Partners for ITS Y2K Awareness to Action" served as the
kick-off for a 500-day campaign to resolve the Y2K problems in ITS, and
a product of the summit is "Steps for Action," a compilation of information
for addressing Y2K problems from the educational, management, technical,
and institutional
perspectives. The participants at the summit represented industry; federal,
state, and local governments; and systems operators in all modes of surface
transportation, including transit, highway, and rail.
"The challenges of the Year
2000 problem are not limited to the federal government. Today's summit
is an important step in our effort to work with partners at the state
and local levels to minimize disruptions to transportation systems as
we make the transition to the Year 2000," said keynote speaker John A.
Koskinen, chair of the President's Council on Year 2000 Conversion.
"Steps for Action" was published
as a brochure, which is intended to serve as an organ
izing tool to help all people
involved in ITS activities to "map out your Y2K problem-solving activities
between now and January 1, 2000." This article is adapted from the brochure.
The entire text of the brochure is available on the Internet at www.fhwa.dot.gov/y2k.
Downey pledged that USDOT will
take advantage of every opportunity to communicate the importance of dealing
promptly with Y2K.
"[The Y2K]
pro "We
will facilitate a national Y2K dialog and provide whatever assistance
we can to ensure the safe, orderly operation of our transportation system.
We will routinely provide information to our public- and private-sector
partners to share examples of good practice and to encourage their adoption.
We will assist in regional Y2K seminars and provide our ITS Y2K partners
with materials that can be used in presentations at local, regional, state,
and national conferences. We urge our state and local partners to use
their regularly allocated federal highway and transit funds to repair
their Y2K problems." he wrote.
The Central Questions
In "Steps for Action," Downey asks everyone in the ITS community to consider
the following questions:
- Have you considered
how your intelligent transportation system integrates with other
systems? Have those other systems been checked? Have you considered
the relationships between your system's data, user data, imported
data, software application data, the operating system upon which
all these applications and databases are running, and how they
are affected by the year 2000 problem? Can you identify potential
problems with these complex interrelationships?
- Fixing the Y2K problem
on one individual computer could take an hour. Who pays for
that hour? Multiply that by however many computers you have.
- Have you applied a higher
standard to ensure that ITS public safety systems, including
emergency management and incident management systems, will work?
- Have you made contingency
plans? What if you've done everything possible, but your system
fails because of failures in interrelated systems, such as telecommunications
or energy systems?
- Will you be ready on
Jan. 1?
Characteristics of a Successful
Compliance Program
The participants in the summit identified several characteristics of a
successful Y2K compliance initiative:
- Active involvement and
support of executives and elected officials.
- Assessment of the mission-critical
functions most likely affected by the Y2K challenge.
- The most appropriate
approach to Y2K assessment of ITS technologies, such as freeway
management systems, is to inventory information system assets,
assess the level of vulnerability, test alternative scenarios
to gauge response, adopt strategies to deal with any Y2K problems,
and develop a contingency plan in the event that these strategies
do not work. The contingency element of this problem-solving
approach is one that is often overlooked, but that could potentially
be most important in averting serious disruption.
- An organizational strategy
for dealing with myriad problems that cross organizational and
jurisdictional boundaries. The most effective approach to organizational
ITS Y2K efforts is to find a "champion" who can lead the effort
and who has the respect of organizational leaders.
- A structure to facilitate
the exchange of information about successes and failures with
integrated systems to help others avoid common pitfalls. Because
the transportation community is so large and diverse, USDOT
has a major role to play in information dissemination.
Recommendations
It is critical to seek out the experiences of others who can provide "lessons
learned" about effective strategies and coordination efforts for ITS Y2K.
The experts at the summit gave the following advice:
- Get started now. The
deadline for resolving the Y2K problem cannot be extended.
- Set priorities. Mission-critical
systems should have first call on resources.
- Public-sector agencies
should develop and implement an outreach plan to inform their
constituents of steps they are taking to address the Y2K problem.
Confidence is established by sharing information.
- Share information. Create
a central clearinghouse an authoritative source on ITS Y2K
issues or direct people to existing resources. Provide resources
for a speakers bureau on Y2K remediation.
- Network with your peers.
Maybe someone else has encountered the same or similar problems
with their intelligent transportation systems. Take advantage
of opportunities for peer review and support.
- Work with other agencies
and organizations that play a role in supporting the safety
and productivity of the transportation system: emergency services,
public utilities, shippers and carriers, port operators, law
enforcement, and others. Also, consult members of technical
and professional organizations.
- Meet with emergency
management agencies; consider designating a regional agency
to lead contingency planning efforts.
- Get legal staff involved
as early as possible. Contractual issues and liability questions
must be resolved quickly and with the assistance of legal staff.
- Top management support
is critical. Keep leadership aware and make a forceful case
without being an alarmist.
- Assign a top-flight
manager and provide the resources and authority necessary to
get the job done.
- Technical support is
key. Be willing to pay for the talent and expertise needed to
accomplish necessary tasks, whether contract support or in-house
staff.
- Have a test plan and
follow it. Many estimates of ITS Y2K repairs indicate that testing
will take up half of the overall project time line. Some "fixes"
may fail, and you must allow enough time to solve the problem
and retest.
- Provide information
on ITS Y2K compliance through databases and customer advisories.
(If all else fails, resort to Y2K "recall notices.")
- Take advantage of the
"crisis atmosphere" to leverage awareness and promote deeper
understanding of information technology and systems (including
embedded systems). This kind of visibility for ITS may not occur
again in the near future.
- Federal technology transfer
programs should address Y2K issues.
- All agencies and organizations
should integrate the Y2K message in training courses, raise
the issue at conferences, and identify Y2K compliance as an
issue on documents such as purchase orders and invoices.
- To the extent possible,
agencies should take advantage of traditional service providers
(e.g., accountants). Many of these vendors have developed extensive
Y2K capabilities.
- Take advantage of traditional
channels for communication (newsletters, association publications,
bulletin boards, and Web sites).
- Contact your venders
and request the Y2K compliance status of their products, but
have a contingency plan in case an external system or service
provided by a vendor, partner, or utility fails.
- Develop or provide links
to self-assessment tests for "simple" systems such as personal
computers.
- Train all personnel
on how to respond to contingencies.
Pitfalls
Summit participants identified several pitfalls to be avoided and some
of the barriers to effective management of ITS Y2K repairs:
- Be persistent when reaching
out for information or cooperation.
- Try not to be overwhelmed
by the magnitude of the problem cut it into manageable bits.
- On the other hand, do
not ignore or trivialize the problem. Do not assume that if
there is a problem, someone else will provide a simple solution.
- Maintain a "big picture"
perspective don't focus so narrowly on one aspect that you
lose sight of other critical issues.
- Timing is a major potential
problem; decision-making cycles may not be in sync for different
levels of government or types of organizations.
- Maintain awareness of
potential problems with international partners. (Some countries
may not be acting quickly enough. The GartnerGroup, a Y2K consulting
firm, forecasts that while 15 percent of the companies in the
United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom may experience
a mission-critical system failure, it is likely that 50 percent
of the companies in Germany and Japan will have mission-critical
system failures.)
- Recognize that compliance
means different things to different people. Be certain that
everyone is operating with the same set of definitions.
- Understand that compliance
does not equal contingency planning. You still need to ask what
if" questions and account for internal and external failures.
(If no one understands how the plan is to be implemented or
what to do if something goes wrong, all of the planning in the
world may fail to deliver the goods.)
Resources
The following World Wide Web sites provide information about Y2K solutions.
In addition, newspapers, magazines, and television stations are increasing
their Y2K coverage.
- http://www.y2k.gov"
President's Council on Year 2000 Conversion. Links to other
federal Y2K operations and other resources.
- www.y2ktransport.dot.gov
USDOT's ITS Y2K Web site.
- www.fhwa.dot.gov/y2k
Federal Highway Administration's Y2K site.
- www.nawgits.com/y2kforum
National Associations Working Group for ITS.
- www.itsa.org Intelligent
Transportation Society of America (ITS America).
- pti.nw.dc.us/membership/y2k
Public Technology Inc.'s Y2K site, providing information for
local officials and their staffs.
- www.itaa.org/year2000.htm
Information Technology Association of America.
- www.itpolicy.gsa.gov/mks/yr2000/cioy2k.htm
Recommended Year 2000 Contract Language (Final FAR Rule).
(This listing of these
Web sites does not imply an endorsement of the information contained
on the Web site or of the organizations posting information on those
sites.)

Pamela Crenshaw is a
transportation specialist in the Office of Traffic Management and ITS
Applications for the Federal Highway Administration. She is a member of
the Midwest Program Delivery Team, responsible for providing program,
policy, and technical assistance to former FHWA Regions Six and Seven.
She has been part of the ITS program for two years. Previously, she was
a traffic engineer for 10 years with the city of Philadelphia. She has
a bachelor's degree in civil engineering from Howard University and is
currently pursuing her master's degree in civil engineering at Howard
University on a part-time basis.
Articles & Departments
Making it Happen: Implementing the FHWA Restructuring
Plan
Is Benchmarking in Your Future?
Building Roads in Sync with Community Values
Seismic Protection of Bridges
Getting Around in Japan: The Status and Challenges
of ITS a
Getting Smoother Pavement: An Arizona Success
Story That's Adaptable Nationwide
Brownfields and Bikeways: Making a Clean Start
FHWA's Computer Systems Are Ready for the Year 2000
"Steps for Action" - Making Sure ITS Is Ready
for the Year 2000
Value Pricing Helps Reduce Congestion
|