 |
PPT version for Printing
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study
Advanced Street Name Signs
Dr. James Jenness, Westat
Overview
- Background
- Status of Data Collection
- Study Design
- Remaining Data Needs
- Evaluation Considerations
Background
Provide advance guide signs and street name signs
- Ranked 14th
- NCHRP Report 500 Series Older Driver Guidebook
- Older drivers are more involved in intersection crashes than other drivers
- Older drivers exhibit excessive vehicle-braking at/before intersections
|
|
- Tried, low cost, short-term implementation
- Target crashes
- All intersection related
- Rear-end
- Late lane changes
- Night
- Older drivers
- Consistent signing across jurisdictions also important
|
 |
- Differing methods to provide street names in advance of intersection:
- Green and white Advance Street Name signs
|
|
|
- MUTCD W3-3 advance traffic control signs with W16-8 supplemental warning plaques
|
Data Collection
Status of Data Collection
- Massachusetts
- Blanketed strategy across four districts in 2004
- 200 sites included in the study
- Over 400 installed
- Lack of ADT data limited sample
- Limited crash data 2002-2005
- 500 intersection-years of before crash data
- 250 intersection-years of after crash data
|
|
- North Carolina
- Blanketed strategy in Cary, NC in 2001
- 100 sites included in the study
- Crash data from 1997-2004
- 400 intersection-years of before crash data
- 300 intersection-years of after crash data
|
|
Study Design
- Required Sample Size
- Minimum: 803 intersection-years per period
- Detect a 5 percent reduction in total crashes with 95 percent confidence
- Desirable: 2,031 intersection-years per period
- Detect a 10 percent reduction in older driver crashes with 95 percent confidence
- Assumptions
- 7.0 crashes per intersection per year in the before period, of which 9 percent involve older drivers
- Crash rate based on preliminary data from MA sites, older-driver share based on Toronto data
- Before and after periods are of equal length
- Equal number of intersection-years for treatment and reference sites
Remaining Data Needs
- Minimum: Need 450 more after intersection-years
- Desirable: Need 1,130 before intersection- years and 1680 after intersection-years for older driver
- Need additional installations
Evaluation Considerations
- Do not have large enough sample size
- Comparing two methods of signing
- Limited ADT data in Massachusetts
< Presentation 10 | Presentation 12 >
|