Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration Go to TFHRC homeGo to FHWA websiteFeedback

Go to FHWA website Go to DOT website Study of Adequacy of Commercial Truck Parking Facilities--Technical Report (FHWA-RD-01-158):

view pdf version PDF icon

5.0  ACTIVITIES TO REDUCE SHORTAGES

5.1         Introduction

This section of the report presents a compilation of recommended actions for addressing commercial truck parking shortages. The first set of recommendations was obtained through discussions with various stakeholder groups. These are groups that, in general, represent the national stakeholder constituencies, such as the Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance (CVSA) [enforcement] and Parents Against Tired Truckers (PATT) [safety community]. These stakeholders help provide a high-level, national view on the issue and possible solutions.

The second set of recommendations was provided by the participating State partnerships. The recommendations, while often mirroring the national-level recommendations, also focus on State- and corridor-specific solutions – that is, the “grass roots” level.

5.2          Rest Area Forum

On June 29-30, 1999, FHWA hosted a two-day Rest Area Forum in Atlanta, GA. More than 70 representatives from State DOTs and enforcement agencies, the motor carrier industry, commercial drivers, commercial truck stop operators, safety advocates, and other interested stakeholders participated in the Forum, which was intended to achieve the following objectives:

A number of issues were identified by the participants, and recommendations were developed for the seven highest-ranked issues, which are presented below, but not in any ranked order.

These recommendations served as a resource for identifying a number of questions that were included in the survey.(2) It is interesting to note that the findings of the current study, which draws upon a significantly larger (and different) population than that included in the Rest Area Forum, are consistent with and support these recommendations. The Rest Area Forum report also noted that the recommendations developed were not necessarily consensus recommendations and that various stakeholders disagreed on approaches to addressing shortages of commercial vehicle parking spaces. The results of the current study support this lack of consensus, in particular on the issue of whether parking space shortages should be addressed by expanding public rest areas or relying on the private sector to meet demand.

5.3         National Stakeholder Discussions

During the course of the study, FHWA provided the study team with a detailed listing of stakeholder groups that comprise the “national stakeholder” interests. These groups represent the enforcement community, the motor carrier industry, commercial truck stop operators, shippers and receivers, and the safety community. The intent of discussing truck parking space availability issues with stakeholders was to obtain a balanced portrayal of how the issue of truck parking space availability affects the various interest groups.

Each group was contacted by telephone to discuss the proposed interview. Groups were then given a list of questions and issues and either provided written comments or agreed to telephone discussions.As can be seen, the groups share a common desire to solve the truck parking problem. As outlined in this list, a variety of positions were proposed, including expanding public parking, changing regulations and financing, and increasing the number of commercial truck stop and travel plaza spaces:

5.4         Actions Recommended by The State Partnerships

Partners provided a set of recommended actions to solve any parking shortfalls that have been identified either through this study or as a result of other similar studies conducted in recent years for their States. These actions fall into six broad categories, as listed below.

Table 19 summarizes the actions that have either recently been completed or are currently being implemented in each State. Table 20 summarizes the actions by each State partnership for future implementation. The sections that follow describe in more detail some of the specific suggestions or comments associated with each of these six categories.


Table 19 . Summary of recent or current actions pursued by State partners.

State

Expand Public Facilities

Expand Commercial Facilities

Foster Partnerships

Improve Information

Enforcement Changes

Additional Studies

Alabama

           

Alaska

           

Arizona

check mark

check mark

       

Arkansas

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

   

California

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Colorado

check mark

check mark

       

Connecticut

check mark

check mark

       

Delaware

           

Florida

check mark

check mark

       

Georgia

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Idaho

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

   

Illinois

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Indiana

   

check mark

check mark

   

Iowa

check mark

check mark

       

Kansas

           

Kentucky

check mark

         

Louisiana

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Maine

         

check mark

Maryland

check mark

   

check mark

   

Massachusetts

         

check mark

Michigan

         

check mark

Minnesota

           

Mississippi

check mark

         

Missouri

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

   

Montana

check mark

 

check mark

     

Nebraska

check mark

         

Nevada

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

New Hampshire

           

New Jersey

         

check mark

New Mexico

check mark

         

New York

         

check mark

North Carolina

check mark

   

check mark

check mark

check mark

North Dakota

           

Ohio

check mark

check mark

   

check mark

 

Oklahoma

           

Oregon

check mark

   

check mark

   

Pennsylvania

check mark

   

check mark

   

Rhode Island

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

South Carolina

check mark

         

South Dakota

           

Tennessee

check mark

check mark

       

Texas

check mark

         

Utah

           

Vermont

check mark

         

Virginia

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Washington

check mark

         

West Virginia

         

check mark

Wisconsin

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

Wyoming

check mark

   

check mark

check mark

 
Note: Checks denote States reporting recent or current actions.

Table 20. Summary of future actions recommended by State partners.

State

Expand Public Facilities

Expand Commercial Facilities

Foster Partnerships

Improve Information

Enforcement Changes

Additional Studies

Alabama

           

Alaska

           

Arizona

check mark

check mark

       

Arkansas

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

   

California

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Colorado

check mark

check mark

       

Connecticut

check mark

         

Delaware

check mark

     

check mark

 

Florida

check mark

check mark

       

Georgia

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Idaho

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

   

Illinois

check mark

check mark

       

Indiana

check mark

 

check mark

check mark

   

Iowa

check mark

         

Kansas

           

Kentucky

check mark

         

Louisiana

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Maine

         

check mark

Maryland

check mark

   

check mark

   

Massachusetts

check mark

         

Michigan

           

Minnesota

           

Mississippi

check mark

         

Missouri

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

   

Montana

check mark

         

Nebraska

check mark

         

Nevada

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

New Hampshire

           

New Jersey

         

check mark

New Mexico

check mark

         

New York

         

check mark

North Carolina

check mark

   

check mark

check mark

 

North Dakota

check mark

         

Ohio

check mark

check mark

       

Oklahoma

           

Oregon

check mark

   

check mark

   

Pennsylvania

check mark

   

check mark

   

Rhode Island

check mark

   

check mark

   

South Carolina

check mark

         

South Dakota

check mark

         

Tennessee

check mark

check mark

       

Texas

check mark

         

Utah

           

Vermont

check mark

         

Virginia

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

   

Washington

check mark

         

West Virginia

         

check mark

Wisconsin

check mark

check mark

check mark

check mark

 

check mark

Wyoming

check mark

   

check mark

check mark

 
Note: Checks denote States planning or considering future actions.

 

5.4.1        Actions to Expand or Improve Rest Areas

Thirty-two States indicated that they were currently taking or had recently taken actions to expand or improve the public rest area facilities as a strategy to increase the availability of adequate parking for trucks, and five additional States indicated an intention to do so in the future. The recommendations on how to expand public facilities included the following:

5.4.2         Actions to Expand or Improve Commercial Truck Stops and Travel Plazas

Eighteen States indicated that they were currently taking or had recently taken actions to help expand or improve commercial truck stops and travel plazas, and 15 of these States expressed an interest in continuing to do so in the future [c] Six additional States (Delaware, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Texas, and Wyoming) indicated that they intended to rely on the private sector to provide additional commercial truck parking along overcrowded corridors. Growth estimates provided by the NATSO Foundation indicated that the number of private spaces has increased by an average of 6.5 percent per year over the last several years. If this rate continues, much of the private demand can be accommodated by the anticipated growth in private spaces.

5.4.3        Actions to Encourage Formation of Public-Private Partnerships

Six States indicated that they were currently taking or had recently taken actions to encourage formation of public-private partnerships to increase the availability of adequate parking for trucks, and five of these States expressed an interest in continuing to do so in the future. The recommendations on how to encourage formation of public-private partnerships included the following:

5.4.4         Actions to Educate or Inform Drivers about Available Spaces

Seventeen States indicated that they were currently taking or had recently taken actions to better educate or inform drivers about available parking spaces, and 16 of these States expressed an interest in continuing to do so in the future. States suggested that the Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) infrastructure may provide real-time information on the availability of parking to drivers. In addition, States suggested that drivers be informed of the importance of complying with HOS rules to encourage fatigued drivers to pull off the road. Specific recommendations offered by the States included the following:

5.4.5         Actions to Change Parking Enforcement Rules

Five States indicated that they recently had implemented or may in the future implement changes in parking regulations and other development-related regulations related to commercial vehicle parking. Specific recommendations offered by the States included the following:

5.4.6         Actions to Conduct Additional Studies

Eight States indicated that they recently had conducted or may in the future conduct additional studies on the adequacy of parking for commercial vehicles to refine the results emerging from the Section 4027 study and to develop more detailed strategies targeted at specific locations.

One State will be pursing more detailed truck parking supply and demand studies at the State and regional levels on specific, heavily traveled truck corridors. The methodology used for the national study will be modified. Field interviews with truckers could be added to make the results of these studies more useful as planning tools for developing measures to address identified parking problems.

Another State suggested that a multi-State committee be established to evaluate alternatives and recommend solutions that would address “on-time deliveries.” Many States noted that truck parking demand at certain locations is a reflection of trucks “staging” to provide just-in-time delivery.

Previous | Table of Contents | Next