Skip to contentUnited States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration Go to TFHRC homeGo to FHWA websiteFeedback

CHAPTER 3. CURRENT PRACTICES

This chapter describes the activities and findings associated with a review of current State and local agency practices related to overhead guide signs and street-name signs. This task was conducted to establish a fundamental understanding of the design and application practices for those types of signs.

ACTIVITIES

The activities associated with this effort included a review of State and national versions of the MUTCD and a survey of State and local agency personnel. The results of the MUTCD reviews and the survey of transportation agencies are divided by subject into overhead signs and street-name signs.

Review of National and State MUTCDs

The MUTCD establishes the guiding principles for the use of traffic control devices, including overhead and street-name signs. When this review was conducted, the 1988 MUTCD was the current edition of the national manual. However, FHWA has since developed and published a new edition. In the first effort of this task, the researchers reviewed the applicable portions of the 1988 MUTCD and then proposed a Millennium Manual (it had not been published when this review occurred) to establish the basic principles for the design and placement of overhead signs and street-name signs.

The MUTCD issued by the Federal Government is referred to as the national MUTCD and it is intended to promote national uniformity of traffic control devices. However, because the Federal Government does not build and maintain roadways (with a few exceptions, such as forest roads), the Federal Government is not responsible for placing and maintaining traffic control devices. Federal and State laws require each State to adopt a traffic control device manual that meets or exceeds the requirements of the national manual. These State manuals can take one of three different forms: the national MUTCD, the national MUTCD with a State supplement, or a State manual. Almost half of the States have adopted the national MUTCD as a complete document without any changes. But more than half of the States have made changes to the national MUTCD through a State supplement or a State version of the MUTCD. Despite the existence of a national MUTCD, the fact that there are different versions of the MUTCD in the various States can lead to important differences from one part of the United States to another. Therefore, as part of this activity, the researchers also reviewed several State MUTCDs for information regarding the design of overhead and street-name signs. The State MUTCDs, or their equivalents, that were reviewed included:

In some cases, the documents reviewed may not be completely up to date. This is a particular issue for the legend height in the street-name signs. The national MUTCD was revised in 1997 to increase the size of the legend. This may not be reflected in all of the State documents.

Survey of Practitioners

The MUTCD establishes minimum standards and guidelines, which are often exceeded in common practices. Furthermore, other than the courtroom, there Is no enforcement mechanism for the MUTCD. Therefore, it is not uncommon for MUTCD principles to be violated (knowingly or unknowingly) in actual practice. In order to assess the differences between the MUTCD principles and actual practices, researchers conducted an e-mail survey of practitioners at State and local transportation agencies.

The survey was distributed to five State and five local agencies. Table 9 lists the nine agencies that responded. Figure 1 presents the questions submitted to the practitioners. The complete survey as sent to the practitioners is included in appendix A. Appendix A also contains the complete responses as received from the agencies for overhead signs and street-name signs. The results from the surveys are summarized and discussed in the sections addressing overhead signs and street-name signs.

Table 9. List of Transportation Agencies That Responded

Type of Agency

Agencies

State

California

Florida

Maryland

Minnesota

Pennsylvania

Local

City of Austin, TX

City of Pueblo, CO

Montgomery County, MD

Pierce County, WA

Figure 1. Questions Included in Transportation Agency E-Mail Survey

OVERHEAD SIGNS
What size Is the legend (typical letter height)?
What alphabet is used for the legend (Series E (Modified), other)?
What sheeting material(s) do you use for overhead signs (background and legend)?
Do you use a higher grade of sheeting for overhead signs compared to ground-mounted signs?
What is the typical height to the bottom of an overhead sign?
Do you have any agency guidelines for the design of overhead signs that are different from that contained in your State's MUTCD? (If so, please send us a copy at your convenience.)

STREET-NAME SIGNS
What is your agency's policy for providing street-name signs (under what conditions are street-name signs provided and where are they located)?
How high are the street-name signs mounted?
What colors are your street-name signs?
What size Is the standard blank/blade (do you use other sizes)?
What size Is the legend?
What alphabet is used for the legend (Series D, Series E (Modified), other)?
What sheeting material(s) do you use for street-name signs (background and legend)?
Do you have any agency guidelines for the design of street-name signs that are different from that contained in your State's MUTCD? (If so, please send us a copy at your convenience.)

OVERHEAD SIGNS

Overhead signs are any signs that are mounted in a manner that allows vehicles to drive under the signs. These signs are typically placed on sign bridges or cantilever sign supports. Overhead signs can also be placed on traffic signal mast arms. The most common type of overhead sign is the freeway guide sign. For this research study, the researchers were concerned about overhead guide signs, overhead street-name signs, and post-mounted street-name signs.

Other types of signs may also be placed overhead. The researchers have observed regulatory, warning, construction, and services signs mounted overhead. Commonly used overhead regulatory signs include signal-related signs (LEFT TURN SIGNAL, LEFT TURN YIELD ON [green ball], NO LEFT TURN, etc.), lane-use control signs, hazardous cargo signs, and others. Examples of warning signs that may be mounted overhead include a LANE ENDS sign, an advisory exit speed sign, an EXIT ONLY panel, and others. The Initial minimum levels published by FHWA did not address yellow, orange, or red signs mounted in the overhead position.

There are a number of factors that have a significant effect on the nighttime visibility of overhead signs. The most significant of these Is the lower level of illumination reaching signs in the overhead position. Other factors include, but are not limited to, variations in signing materials (including button copy), variations in legend size and design, and variations in mounting height.

Previous Efforts on MR Levels

MR levels for overhead signs were Included in the original FHWA recommendations for white background signs and green background signs only. There were no levels proposed for yellow or red background overhead signs. When the MR levels were revised, the levels for overhead signs were eliminated. The original MR recommendations for white-and-green overhead signs are shown in tables 6 and 7. These tables also include the revised levels where the minimum levels for the overhead signs were eliminated.

Review of MUTCD Principles

As indicated previously, the overhead sign portion of this project is focusing upon overhead guide signs. In conducting the review of MUTCD principles for overhead guide signs, the researchers reviewed the expressway and freeway chapters of the MUTCD. MUTCDs, or the equivalent manuals, were evaluated from the following States: California, Maryland, Minnesota, and Texas. The following provides some of the key findings from the review as they relate to the visibility or retroreflectivity aspects of overhead signs:

Survey of Agency Practices

As mentioned previously, the researchers also conducted a survey of five State and five local agencies to identify the actual practices related to overhead signs. Table 9 lists the agencies that responded to the survey. Figure 1 presents the questions that were part of the survey. The complete responses to the overhead sign questions from each agency are contained in appendix A. Tables 10 and 11 provide a capsule summary of the survey responses from each agency.

STREET-NAME SIGNS

There are several different types of street-name signs. The most common is the post-mounted horizontal rectangular sign. This type of street-name sign is often mounted above another type of sign, such as a STOP sign. Another common type of street-name sign is mounted on traffic signal mast arms or span wire. Street-name signs are also used in advance of intersections, alone or in combination with other types of signs (such as a crossroad warning sign, W2-1).

There are great variations in the type, design, and placement of street-name signs. The most common is the white on green with 6-inch letters. There are also great variations in the type of legend used on street-name signs. Some agencies simply provide the street name. Others include the street classification (Rd, St, Blvd, Ave, etc.) and/or a block number. The legend may be In capitals or in uppercase/lowercase letters. There are many agencies that use colors other than white on green.


Table 10. State Agency Responses to Overhead Sign Questions

Question

State 1

State 2

State 3

State 4

State 5

General Comments

None

None

None

None

None

1. What is the legend (typical letter height)? (uppercase/lowercase, inches)

16/12

MUTCD Section 2F

16/12
20/15 fry-fry signs

MUTCD Standard

16/12

2. What alphabet is used for the legend (Series E (Modified), other)?

Series E (Modified)

Series E (Modified)

Series E (Modified)

Series E (Modified)

Series E (Modified)

3. What sheeting material(s) do you use for overhead signs (background and legend)?

Type III or IV
(high-intensity or microprismatic)

Type III

Type III

Visual Impact Performance (VIP) microprismatic

Type III

4. Do you use a higher grade of sheeting for overhead signs compared to ground-mounted signs?

No

No

No (all overhead signs are lighted)

See question 3.

No

5. What is the typical height to the bottom of an overhead sign?

18 ft

17 ft-6 inches

20 ft-9 inches

17 ft-4 inches

17 ft

6. Do you have any agency guidelines for the design of overhead signs that are different from that contained in your State's MUTCD?

No

No

No

Uses SignCAD program

Yes


Table 11. Local Agency Responses to Overhead Sign Questions

Question

City 1

City 2

County 1

County 2

General Comments

Except for mast-arm signs, rarely install overhead signs. Answers based on street-name mast-arm signs.

Do not use overhead signs other than standard highway sign designs.

None

None

1. What is the legend (typical letter height)? (uppercase/lowercase, inches)

10

See general comment.

8/6

6

2. What alphabet is used for the legend (Series E (Modified), other)?

Series B and C

See general comment.

Series C

Series E (Modified)

3. What sheeting material(s) do you use for overhead signs (background and legend)?

Green electronic cuttable (EC) film on white type III (high-intensity)

See general comment.

Type III (high-intensity)

VIP microprismatic

4. Do you use a higher grade of sheeting for overhead signs compared to ground-mounted signs?

No

See general comment.

Experimenting with VIP microprismatic

Type III for red and yellow ground signs and type I for white, green, and blue ground signs

5. What is the typical height to the bottom of an overhead sign?

17 ft-6 inches

See general comment.

16 ft minimum,

19 ft preferred

16 ft-6 inches to

17 ft-0 inches

6. Do you have any agency guidelines for the design of overhead signs that are different from that contained in your State's MUTCD?

No

See general comment.

Policies are consistent with State agency.

No


There are a number of factors that have a significant effect on the nighttime visibility of street-name signs. These signs are often mounted on only one corner of an intersection, presenting a disadvantaged (left side) position for two of the four approaches. They may also be as high as 10 ft or more If they are mounted above a STOP or YIELD sign. These factors reduce the Illumination reaching the signs, thereby reducing the luminance of the signs. Because of the length of many street names, a narrow stroke-width alphabet (Series B or C) is often used, reducing the legibility of the signs.

Previous Efforts on MR Levels

MR levels for street-name signs were not specifically excluded from the original FHWA recommendations. However, a review of the CARTS model indicates that street-name signs were not in the sign library and were therefore probably not addressed in the development of MR levels. Street-name signs were specifically excluded when the MR levels were revised.

Review of MUTCD Principles

In conducting the review of MUTCD principles for street-name signs, the researchers reviewed the conventional guide sign chapter of the MUTCD. MUTCDs, or the equivalent manuals, were evaluated from the following States: California, Maryland, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, and Texas. The following provides some of the key findings from the review as they relate to the visibility or retroreflectivity aspects of street-name signs:

Survey of Agency Practices

As mentioned, the researchers also conducted a survey of State and local agencies to identify the actual practices related to street-name signs. Table 9 lists the agencies that responded to the survey. Figure 1 presents the questions that were part of the survey. The complete responses to the overhead sign questions from each agency are contained in appendix A. Tables 12 and 13 provide a capsule summary of the survey responses from each agency.

SUMMARY

Based on the activities associated with the review of current practices, the researchers developed the following findings and scenarios related to the overhead signs and street-name signs that were later used in the development of the MR levels.

Findings

The review of MUTCD principles and the survey of agency practices led to the following findings related to the current use of overhead signs and street-name signs:

Table 12. State Agency Responses to Street-Name Sign Questions

Question

State 1

State 2

State 3

State 4

State 5

General Comments

None

None

None

None

None

7. What is your agency's policy for providing street-name signs (under what conditions are street-name signs provided and where are they located)?

State puts street-name signs (SNS) at signalized intersections only. Local agencies are responsible for all others.

State puts mast-arm SNS at signalized intersections. For nonsignalized intersections, State replaces local sign in kind.

Local agencies install SNS at far right and near left corners. Signalized and major streets have overhead and/or advance SNS.

State does not install slat SNS. Only mast-arm SNS are Installed by State.

SNS are local responsibility.

8. How high are the street-name signs mounted?

Mast arm: 15 ft
Post: 5-12 ft

Mast arm: 17 ft
Post: MUTCD

Mast arm: 17 ft
Post: 7 ft minimum

See response to question 7.

Post: 7 ft

9. What colors are your street-name signs?

White on green

Mast arm: White on green
Post: Varies, typically on green or blue background

White on green

See response to question 7.

White on green, black on white, or other contrasting colors

10. What size Is the standard blank/blade (do you use other sizes)? (inches)

Mast arm: 96 by 18

Mast arm: 84 by 18

Mast arm: Variable by 16
Post: Variable by 8

See response to question 7.

36 by 10

11. What size Is the legend? (uppercase/lowercase, inches)

6/4.5

Depends on street name

Mast arm: 8/6
Post: 4

See response to question 7.

6

12. What alphabet is used for the legend (Series D, Series E (Modified), other)?

Series E (Modified)

Mast arm: Series E (Modified)

Post: Series D

Mast arm: Series D
Post: Series C

See response to question 7.

Varies, Series D typical

13. What sheeting material(s) do you use for street-name signs (background and legend)?

Type III or IV

Type III

Type III

See response to question 7.

Varies, type I typical

14. Do you have any agency guidelines for the design of street-name signs that are different from that contained in your State's MUTCD?

No

See appendix.

No

No

No


 Table 13. Local Agency Responses to Street-Name Sign Questions

Question

City 1 City 2

County 1

County 2

General Comments

None

None

None

None

7. What is your agency's policy for providing street-name signs (under what conditions are street-name signs provided and where are they located)?

On mast arm or at one corner minimum

On mast arm for all signalized intersections, on STOP sign post at all nonsignalized intersections

Major streets: On diagonal quadrants
Minor streets: Far right corner of one major street approach

SNS for intersection street only

8. How high are the street-name signs mounted?

7 ft

7 ft minimum, 9.5 ft typical above STOP sign

Approximately 10 ft

7 ft nominal

9. What colors are your street-name signs?

White on green

White on green

White on green

White on green

10. What size Is the standard blank/blade (do you use other sizes)? (inches)

Mast arm: 18
Post: 9

Mast arm: 18
Post: 12
Used to be 9 and 6

9

Arterials: 30 by 9, 36 by 12
Local: 24 by 6, 30 by 6

11. What size Is the legend? (uppercase/lowercase, inches)

Mast arm: 10
Post: 6

8/6
Reduce 1 inch if descender in name

5/3.75

4 on 6-inch blank
6 on 9-inch blank
5 on 12-inch blank with two lines

12. What alphabet is used for the legend (Series D, Series E (Modified), other)?

Series B and C

Series C

Series C

Series B or C

13. What sheeting material(s) do you use for street-name signs (background and legend)?

Green EC film on white type III

Green EC film on white VIP prismatic sheeting

Type III

Type I

14. Do you have any agency guidelines for the design of street-name signs that are different from that contained in your State's MUTCD?

No

No

Updating 1988 policy

No


Scenarios

Based on these findings, the researchers developed the following scenarios that represent best-case, typical, and worst-case situations for nighttime visual performance of overhead guide signs and street-name signs:

Previous | Table of Contents | Next


FHWA
TFHRC Home | FHWA Home | Feedback

United States Department of Transportation - Federal Highway Administration